nr523 week 7 Assignment:  Item Analysis Assignment latest 2019 jan

nr523 week 7 Assignment:  Item Analysis Assignment latest 2019 jan

Question # 00713823 Posted By: spqr Updated on: 01/07/2019 01:21 PM Due on: 01/10/2019
Subject Education Topic Conflict Resolution Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image

Week Seven Assignment:  Item Analysis Assignment Guidelines & Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to help students apply information regarding item analysis.  Students are provided an item analysis as well as test questions.  Upon considering the item analysis information, each students makes a decision to either retain the item or revise it.  Students revise the item while demonstrating best practices regarding test item construction.

Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7  

Total Points Possible: 175

Requirements:

Description of the assignment:

A printout of an item analysis for a 45-item test on HIV/AIDs, along with the corresponding test questions is found in Course Resources. This assignment has two elements.  First the overall reliability of the examination is considered and then the item analysis of specific questions.  Within the item analysis document, there are nine highlighted test questions (Questions 1 – 8 and 45).  These highlighted test questions are the items to be individually analyze.  The analysis of selected test questions consists of two major elements:

  • Using item analysis numerical results
  • Appling best practices regarding item construction

Using the Item Analysis Template (found in Course Resources), the student, first, examines the overall reliability of the test and make suggestions for improvement. Following the required review of overall test reliability, the student will examine the required test items (Questions 1 – 8 and 45); individually.  The analysis includes consideration of numerical item analysis results AND if the selected test question demonstrated best practices regarding item construction.  The student will then provide a decision whether he/she would retain or revise the item.  If the student’s decision is that the item should be revised, the student identifies suggestion (s) to improve the item as well as re-writing the test question to be consistent with base practices of item construction.  For this assignment the desired difficulty index is .70 - .80 for most questions.  The desired discrimination index value is .30 or greater.  There are no mastery items on this examination.  A cover page and running head are required.  If a reference is used, you must provide a reference list.

Criteria for content:

  1.  Review of the reliability of the entire examination:  In this section the MSN student reviews the reliability results of the entire examination.  It includes the following required elements:
  • Explain what is meant by test reliability
  • Identify the name of the statistical test used in the item analysis to determine overall test reliability
  • Identify the overall test reliability
  • Provide a discussion if the overall test reliability is sufficient or if improvement is necessary
  • Identify 2 (two) ways/methods to improve the overall test reliability
  1. Analysis for Individual Test Questions:  For each of the nine identified test questions (items 1 – 8 and 45), the student will identify and  discuss:
  • If the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • If the question has a poor difficulty index
  • If the question has a poor discrimination index
  • If the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use
Preparing the paper

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions:

  1. The use of the Item Analysis Template is required.  It is found within Course Resources.
  2. A reference page is required if a reference is cited.  APA (6th ed.) is required. 

 

Category

Possible

Points

%

Remarks

Review of the reliability of the entire examination

30

17

Required content for this section includes:

 

  • Explain what is meant by test reliability
  • Identify the name of the statistical test used in the item analysis to determine overall test reliability
  • Identify the overall test reliability
  • Provide a discussion if the overall test reliability is sufficient or if improvement is necessary
  • Identify 2 (two) ways/methods to improve the overall test reliability

Question One

15

9

Required content for this section includes:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Question Two

15

9

Required content for this section includes:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Question Three

15

9

Required content for this section includes:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Question Four

15

9

Required content for this section includes:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Question Five

15

9

Required content for this section includes:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Question Six

15

9

Required content for this section includes:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use  

Question Seven

15

9

Required content for this section includes:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Question Eight

15

9

Required content for this section includes:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use  

Question Nine

15

9

Required content for this section includes:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

APA Format (6th edition)

5

3

Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

One deduction for each type of APA style error

Writing Mechanics

5

3

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual.

Total

175

100%

A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

 

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria

 

Exceptional

(100%)

Outstanding or highest level of performance

 

Exceeds

(88%)

Very good or high level of performance

 

Meets

(80%)

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

(38%)

Poor or failing level of performance

 

Developing

(0)

Unsatisfactory level of performance

 

Content

Possible Points =  165 Points

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Review of the reliability of the entire examination

30 Points

 26 Points

24 Points

11 Points

0 Points

 

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Explain what is meant by test reliability
  • Identify the name of the statistical test used in the item analysis to determine overall test reliability
  • Identify the overall test reliability
  • Provide a discussion if the overall test reliability is sufficient or if improvement is necessary
  • Identify 2 (two) ways/methods to improve the overall test reliability

 

 

Presentation of information was good, but was only partially demonstrated in places; all elements were present:

  • Explain what is meant by test reliability
  • Identify the name of the statistical test used in the item analysis to determine overall test reliability
  • Identify the overall test reliability
  • Provide a discussion if the overall test reliability is sufficient or if improvement is necessary
  • Identify 2 (two) ways/methods to improve the overall test reliability

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 

  • Explain what is meant by test reliability
  • Identify the name of the statistical test used in the item analysis to determine overall test reliability
  • Identify the overall test reliability
  • Provide a discussion if the overall test reliability is sufficient or if improvement is necessary
  • Identify 2 (two) ways/methods to improve the overall test reliability

Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

  • Explain what is meant by test reliability
  • Identify the name of the statistical test used in the item analysis to determine overall test reliability
  • Identify the overall test reliability
  • Provide a discussion if the overall test reliability is sufficient or if improvement is necessary
  • Identify 2 (two) ways/methods to improve the overall test reliability

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements:

  • Explain what is meant by test reliability
  • Identify the name of the statistical test used in the item analysis to determine overall test reliability
  • Identify the overall test reliability
  • Provide a discussion if the overall test reliability is sufficient or if improvement is necessary
  • Identify 2 (two) ways/methods to improve the overall test reliability

 

  Analysis for Individual Test Questions: 

 

Question One:

15  Points

 13 Points

12 Points

 6 Points

0 Points

 

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Presentation of information was good, but was only partially demonstrated in places; all elements were present:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information in one,  two, or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Question Two:

15  Points

 13 Points

12 Points

 6 Points

0 Points

 

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

 

Presentation of information was good, but was only partially demonstrated in places; all elements were present:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

 

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information in one,  two, or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Question Three:

15  Points

 13 Points

12 Points

 6 Points

0 Points

 

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information was good, but was only partially demonstrated in places; all elements were present:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information in one,  two, or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Question Four:

15  Points

 13 Points

12 Points

 6 Points

0 Points

 

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information was good, but was only partially demonstrated in places; all elements were present:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information in one,  two, or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Question Five:

15  Points

 13 Points

12 Points

 6 Points

0 Points

 

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Presentation of information was good, but was only partially demonstrated in places; all elements were present:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed  
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Presentation of information in one,  two, or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

 

Question Six:

15  Points

 13 Points

12 Points

 6 Points

0 Points

 

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Presentation of information was good, but was only partially demonstrated in places; all elements were present:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Presentation of information in one,  two, or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Question Seven:

15  Points

 13 Points

12 Points

 6 Points

0 Points

 

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Presentation of information was good, but was only partially demonstrated in places; all elements were present:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Presentation of information in one,  two, or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

 

Question Eight:

15  Points

 13 Points

12 Points

 6 Points

0 Points

 

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Presentation of information was good, but was only partially demonstrated in places; all elements were present:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: 

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Presentation of information in one,  two, or three of the following elements fails to meet expectations:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in four or more of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor discrimination index
  • Identifies if the question should be retained as written or revised
  • If you selected “revision”, describe ALL of the revisions that are needed 
  • If you selected “remain”, state why the question is good to use

 

Question Nine:

15  Points

 13 Points

12 Points

 6 Points

0 Points

 

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Identifies if the question violates any principle of item writing (i.e. does it ask a question, are there any tips to the correct answer, etc.)
  • Identifies if the question has a poor difficulty index
  • Identifies if the question has a poor

 

Dot Image
Report this Question as Inappropriate
Tutorials for this Question
  1. spqr
    Tutorial # 00714281 Posted By: spqr Posted on: 01/07/2019 01:22 PM
    Puchased By: 2
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of nr523 week 7 Assignment:  Item Analysis Assignment latest 2019 jan...
      Get the Solution
    Attachments
    Solution-00714281.zip (100 KB)
  Get the Solution

Great! We have found the solution of this question!

Related Questions and Answers

Whatsapp Lisa