Liberty PHIL 201 Quiz 2 - If one agrees with the conclusion

Results Displayed Submitted Answers, Feedback
Question 1
3 out of 3 points
No inductive argument can arrive at a logically certain conclusion, i.e. in which the conclusion is necessarily true.
Question 2
3 out of 3 points
Identify the following type of syllogism: “All philosophers are good looking individuals. All good looking individuals are intelligent. Therefore all philosophers are intelligent.
Question 3
3 out of 3 points
If one agrees with the conclusion of an argument then it is a good argument.
Question 4
3 out of 3 points
If an argument is sound, it means
Question 5
3 out of 3 points
Suppose that an argument applies a double standard without warrant. What would that fallacy be called, according to our text?
Question 6
3 out of 3 points
This fallacy argues erroneously from the whole to each of the parts:
Question 7
3 out of 3 points
Identify the fallacy: Senator Newkirk’s arguments to increase federal spending for the military should be rejected. He is only arguing because he has several military bases in his state and is beginning his re-election campaign.
Question 8
3 out of 3 points
“Begging the question” is a fallacy of presumption.
Question 9
3 out of 3 points
Identify the fallacy: There are more churches in New York City than in any other city in the USA. New York City also has the highest amount of violent crime than any other city. It’s pretty obvious that to relieve the crime problem we should reduce the churches.
Question 10
3 out of 3 points
A well-known fallacy that is usually the result of ambiguous grammatical construction is called:
Question 11
3 out of 3 points
The principle of simplicity says we should try to simplify complex arguments.
Question 12
3 out of 3 points
In the best explanation approach, illumination
Question 13
3 out of 3 points
Explanatory Scope refers to:
Question 14
3 out of 3 points
The term for beliefs relating together in a way that is mutually supportive:
Question 15
3 out of 3 points
The explanation that can be understood with the least amount of effort, vagueness, and ambiguity has the best:
Question 16
3 out of 3 points
In a deductive syllogism, if the premises are true and the conclusion is true, then the argument is valid.
Question 17
3 out of 3 points
Invalid deductive arguments are the same as inductive arguments.
Question 18
3 out of 3 points
Identify this kind of argument: If naturalism is true, then all things are determined and there is no free will. If there is no free will then morality makes no sense. Therefore, if naturalism is true then morality makes no sense.
Question 19
3 out of 3 points
An inference drawn from statistical reasoning is deductive.
Question 20
3 out of 3 points
An argument where one gathers identical particular instances and arrives at a common conclusion:
Friday, April 19, 2019 11:04:00 AM EDT

-
Rating:
5/
Solution: Liberty PHIL 201 Quiz 2 - If one agrees with the conclusion