Grand Canyon NUR504 Week 4 Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Identification Latest 2015

This is a CLC assignment.
Follow the instructions provided in "CLC Assignment: Evidence-Based Project (EBP)."
Utilize the Synthesis Table, Table of Evidence and EBA Project Evaluation Tool to complete your CLC assignment. Submit these documents in Topic 5 as the CLC assignment.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.
Synthesis Table Example
Name of Article |
Name of Article |
Name of Article |
Name of Article |
|
Levels of Evidence |
||||
Study Design |
||||
Variable to be studied |
||||
Variable to be studied |
||||
Variable to be studied |
Compare template above to my table below. At a glance you can see the names of the most important articles I choose, the level of evidence of that study, what the design was, and what variables were important to know about in each article. As you study the table, the reader can clearly see more studies in support of BiPAP than IS along with other information that would be of interest to the provider to support standards of care.
Table 2 Synthesis of IS and NIPPV Evidence /Types of Surgery
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
EBP Synthesis Table 2
Guimaraes M. 2008 |
Gosseling, R. 2000 |
Joris, J. 1997 |
Ebeo, C. 2002 |
Westwood K. 2007 |
Leech, C 2007 |
Freitas, E. 2007 |
Overend, R. 2001 |
Sungur, M. 2007 |
Bourne, R. 2007 |
El Solh 2006 |
National Guideline Clearing House 2004 |
|
Levels of Evidence |
I |
II |
II |
II |
III |
VII |
I |
I |
VII |
IV |
III |
I |
Design |
Systematic Review |
RTC |
RCT |
RCT |
Observational Study-Non Randomized |
Case Report |
RTC |
Systematic Review |
Expert Comment |
Retrospective Quantitative |
Prospective Control Trial |
NGC/AHRQ Guideline |
Evidence does not support IS in prevention of PPCs |
X |
X |
X |
X |
||||||||
Evidence supporting use of IS to prevent PPCs |
X |
|||||||||||
Evidence Supporting Use of NIPPV to Prevent PPCs |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|||||
NIPPV/BiPAP Treatment 12/4 12-24hrs Post-op 2 out of 3 hrs |
X |
X |
Intraoperative & 3hrs post-op |
48 hrs post extubation 5 on out of 6 hrs BiPAP S/T-D |
||||||||
Obese Related Surgery |
X |
X |
X Hip |
X |
X |
X Obese patients |
X (OSA & surgery) |
|||||
Abdominal Surgery |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|||||||
Thoracic Area/Cardiac |
X |
X |
X |
QRTC= quasi-experimental -nonrandomized controlled trials CD=cross-over design CS=case series PCS= prospective cohort study RCS=retrospective case series MA=meta-analysis
NIPPV=Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation BiPAP=Bi-level positive airway pressure hrs=hours
NUR-504: Table of Evidence
Study 1 |
Study 2 |
Study 3 |
Study 4 |
Study 5 |
|
Author |
|||||
Study title |
|||||
Research Questions |
|||||
Design |
|||||
Setting/Sample |
|||||
Methods: intervention/instruments |
|||||
Analysis |
|||||
Key findings |
|||||
Recommendations |
|||||
How this supports EBP/Capstone |
EBP Project Evaluation
Citation |
Purpose |
Design |
Subject/Setting |
Findings/Results Independent Variable Dependent Variable
|
Implication for Practice |
Methods |
Data Analysis Stats |
Level & Quality of Evidence (Strength & Confidence to Act)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

-
Rating:
5/
Solution: Grand Canyon NUR504 Week 4 Collaborative Learning Community: EBP Identification Latest 2015