Choose a Qualitative or Quantitative Research Article from the PICOT search that you have been doing

- Choose a Qualitative or Quantitative Research Article from the PICOT search that you have been doing in the first few weeks of class. It must be from a scholarly peer reviewed nursing journal. Use the critiquing chart that corresponds to your article (quantitative or qualitative).
- Complete the corresponding Chart Critique Guide for either quantitative or qualitative research study. Then use the completed chart to help you compose a scholarly paper in APA format. Find the Grading Rubrics for Article Critiquing Charts and Critique below.
- Submit the completed Chart of Individual Article Critique
- Submit your paper early, prior to the deadline of Monday 3/1/21 to give yourself a chance to correct it to be < 20% similarity match, as needed and then resubmit it.
PICOT: For emergency room nurses, how implementing an effective de-escalation process that includes continued education for staff nurses, compare to other de-escalation process, help decrease workplace violence towards staff members and help with nursing retention and patient care.
Article being used: Han C., Lin C., Barnard A., Hsiao Y., Goopy S., & Chen L. (2017). Workplace violence against emergency nurses in Taiwan: A phenomenographic study. Nursing Outlook, 65(4), 428-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.04.003
QUALITATIVE Research Article Critique Chart
Your PICO Question: |
|
Your Name and Date: |
|
Title, author(s), Year, Journal: |
|
Citation: |
|
Database: |
|
Critiquing Points as Listed Below |
1.Describe/Explain each Point 2.Evaluate Points (logical, clarity, missing) |
Study Title |
|
Author(s), Journal Source, Year |
|
Study Design/Method (Phenomenology, Ethnography, Grounded Theory, Narrative, Descriptive, Participatory Action, Case) |
|
Ethics (IRB approval, participant confidentiality, stakeholders identified) |
|
Study Purpose/Objectives/Aim |
|
Literature Review (supports need for study, gaps in knowledge identified) |
|
Grand Tour Research Question (what the study will answer/investigate |
|
Investigator Bias/ assumptions (bracketing) |
|
Sampling Strategy (purposive, snowball, convenience, theoretical) |
|
Participants Characteristics (sample size, participant selection & rationale for choice is relevant to research question) |
|
Data Collection Method (setting, interviews, observation, focus groups, internet, document review) |
|
Data Management (computer software, coding, codebook) |
|
Data Analysis Technique (constant comparative, Colaizzi, van Manen, etc.) Memos, journaling and analytic notes were kept by the investigator. |
|
Trustworthiness Assured (credibility, dependability, transferability, confirmability) The data collected adequately addresses the problem. Saturation was reached by sufficient data collected. Adequate participant quotes provided to give a clear picture. |
|
Results (believable, participant quotes provided) limitations/barriers are discussed |
|
Implications: (results applicable for clinical practice) |
|
Strengths of the Study |
|
Weaknesses of the Study |
|
Overall Impression of its utility for your Evidence Based Practice Plan |
|
Student Name:
Date:
Requirement |
% Score |
Requirement Met |
Partially Met |
Missing |
Score |
Title Page in APA Format |
|
|
|
|
|
Lists PICOT Question & Citation in APA, Database where located |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Introduction |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Includes all requirements on the Critique Chart (Quantitative or Qualitative according to the article chosen) |
65 |
|
|
|
|
Conclusion |
5 |
|
|
|
|
Scholarly Writing follows APA format, grammar, sentence structure, citations match with references, Times Roman 12 point font, 1” margins, left sided justified, double spaced, used headings for each paper requirement Approximately 3-5 pages excluding title & reference page |
15 |
|
|
|
|
Turnitin score < 20% |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Score _____/ 100%
Instructor Comments:

-
Rating:
5/
Solution: Choose a Qualitative or Quantitative Research Article from the PICOT search that you have been doing